Historical Landmarks, State Policies and Indigenous Selfdetermination in Brazil and Canada

Frederico Cesar Barbosa de Oliveira

Abstract


The purpose of this article is to discuss the historical and political meaning of the struggles for selfdetermination

of indigenous movements in Brazil and Canada over the past decades. I propose a comparativestudy between these two countries, focusing this journey particularly on four sets of similar policies implementedin the two nation-states that targeted, in some ways, indigenous societies. In order to analyze some key milestonessince the colony to date, I investigate the main indigenous strategies implemented by both countries that resultedin serious restrictions for indigenous nations to exercise their territorial patterns and many other aspects relatedto their ancient traditions. Another purpose of this paper is to discuss how these processes shaped the currentdemands of indigenous political movements. Furthermore, this paper intends to consider the basic premisesunderlying their fight, the contexts in which the indigenous movements emerged and evolved, as well as the
possibilities and developments of their fundamental demands.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Albert, B. (2000). Associaes indgenas e desenvolvimento sustentvel na Amaznia brasileira.

In Ricardo, C (Ed.), Povos Indgenas no Brasil, 1996-2000 (pp. 197-207). So Paulo:

Instituto Socioambiental.

Almeida, R. (1997). O diretrio dos ndios; um projeto de civilizao no Brasil do sculo

XVIII. Braslia: Editora Universidade de Braslia.

Altbach, P. & Kelly, G. 1978. Education and colonialism. New York: Longman.

Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of

Nationalism. London: Verso.

Ash, M. (2002). Self-Government in the New Millennium. In Bird, L., Land, L. & Macadam, M

(Eds.), Nation to Nation: Aboriginal Sovereignty and the Future of Canada (pp. 65-73).

Toronto & Vancouver: Irwin Publishing.

Baines, S. (1996). Primeiras impresses sobre a etnologia indgena no Canad. Srie

Antropologia, no.196, pp.1-24. Retrieved on November 24, 2011, from www.dan.unb.br.

Borovoy, A. (1966). Human rights and racial equality. Toronto: Ontario Woodsworth Memorial

Foundation

Borrows, J. (2002). Recovering Canada: the resurgence of Indigenous law. Toronto: University

of Toronto Press.

Cardinal, H. (1969). Unjust society: the tragedy of Canadas Indians. Edmonton: M.G. Hurtig.

Cardoso de Oliveira, R. (1988). Sobre o Pensamento Antropolgico. (Biblioteca Tempo

Universidade; n 83). Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro; Braslia: CNPq

Cardoso de Oliveira, R. (2000). Ao indigenista, etnicidade e o dilogo intertnico. In Estudos

Avanados, 14(40), pp. 213-30.

Carneiro da Cunha, M. (1987). Os direitos do ndios: ensaios e documentos. So Paulo: Editora

Brasiliense.

Carneiro da Cunha, M., (1987b). Etnicidade: da cultura residual mas irredutvel. In Carneiro da

Cunha, M. (Ed.), Antropologia do Brasil: mito, histria, etnicidade (pp. 96-108). So

Paulo: Editora Brasiliense.

Cumming, P & Mickemberg, N. (1972). Native rights in Canada. Toronto: Indian-Eskimo

Association of Canada / General Publishing.

Del Priori, M & Venncio, R. (2001). O livro de ouro da histria do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro:

Ediouro.

Farage, N. (1991). As Muralhas dos Sertes: os povos indgenas no rio Branco e a colonizao.

Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra; ANPOCS.

Fidler, D. (1970). Red Power in Canada. Toronto: Vanguard Publications.

Harris, D. (2001). Fish, law and colonialism: the legal capture of Salmon in British Columbia.

Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Hoxie, Frederick. (1984). A Final Promise: The Campaign to Assimilate the Indians, 18801920.

Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Johnson, H. (2007). Two families: treaties and government. Saskatoon: Purich Pub.

Luz, L. (1995). A reviso do estatuto do ndio e a legislao indigenista. In: Silva, A. &

Grupioni, L. (Eds.). A temtica indgena na escola: novos subsdios para professores de

e 2 graus (pp. 91-93). Braslia, MEC/MARI/UNESCO.

Oliveira Filho, J. P. (1998). Indigenismo e territorializao: poderes, rotinas e saberes coloniais

no Brasil contemporneo. Rio de Janeiro: Contra Capa.

Ramos, A. (1997). A convivncia intertnica no Brasil: os ndios e a nao brasileira. Srie

Antropologia, no. 221, pp. 1-17. Retrieved on November 24, 2011, from

www.dan.unb.br.

Ramos, A. (1998), Indigenism: ethnic politics in Brazil, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Ramos, A. (1999). Projetos Indigenistas no Brasil Independente. Srie Antropologia, no. 267, pp.

-16. Retrieved on November 24, 2011, from www.dan.unb.br.

Schouls, Tim. (2002). The basic dilemma: Sovereignty or Assimilation. In: Bird, L., Land, L, &

Macadam, M (Eds.) Nation to Nation: Aboriginal Sovereignty and the Future of Canada

(pp. 12-26). Toronto & Vancouver: Irwin Publishing.

Sutton, Mark. 2011. An introduction to native North America. Boston: Pearson.

Weaver, S. (1981). Making Canadian Indian Policy: the hidden agenda 1968-1970,

Toronto: University of Toronto Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.